This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 25/03/2017 12:30, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 25 09:09, Marco Atzeri wrote:
It seems that the number of max available semaphores is frozen to first call value.That's normal and documented. An existing semaphore set using the same key has the number of semaphores defined in the first call, until you remove the semaphore set with, for instance, ipcrm -s. POSIX has this to say: [EINVAL] The value of nsems is either less than or equal to 0 or greater than the system-imposed limit, or a semaphore identifier exists for the argument key, but the number of semaphores in the set associated with it is less than nsems and nsems is not equal to 0. Linux doesn't care, but BSD does, and our XSI IPC code is 95% BSD. Corinna
noted. Thanks Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |