This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Cygwin kill utility //Was: cgwin_internal(): difference b/w CW_CYGWIN_PID_TO_WINPID and CW_GETPINFO_FULL for taking only dwProcessId ?
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:00:04 -0400
- Subject: Re: Cygwin kill utility //Was: cgwin_internal(): difference b/w CW_CYGWIN_PID_TO_WINPID and CW_GETPINFO_FULL for taking only dwProcessId ?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0C8AED9C at MLBXv04 dot nih dot gov> <20140408031817 dot GA1796 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0C8B4372 at MLBXv04 dot nih dot gov> <20140408090129 dot GC28755 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <6CF2FC1279D0844C9357664DC5A08BA2464FF5 at MLBXV06 dot nih dot gov> <5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0C8B85C2 at MLBXv04 dot nih dot gov> <20140408152118 dot GB4595 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <5344236E dot 8020503 at aol dot com> <20140408164902 dot GD5812 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <20140408174626 dot GJ2437 at calimero dot vinschen dot de>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 07:46:26PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>What he says.
>
>And just if it's still not clear, despite the fact that WJM, we would
>*love* to get more patches. It doesn't mean your patch will go in
>without scrutinizing and maybe we ask for changes, but we're always open
>to bug fixes and cool new functionality, as long as it's POSIXy (or
>Linuxy in case they differ).
Just an added clarification: Lack of patches may result in hilarious
Thursday/feline comments from me.
gf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple