This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Cygwin kill utility //Was: cgwin_internal(): difference b/w CW_CYGWIN_PID_TO_WINPID and CW_GETPINFO_FULL for taking only dwProcessId ?
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 23:18:17 -0400
- Subject: Re: Cygwin kill utility //Was: cgwin_internal(): difference b/w CW_CYGWIN_PID_TO_WINPID and CW_GETPINFO_FULL for taking only dwProcessId ?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0C8AED9C at MLBXv04 dot nih dot gov>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 03:01:18AM +0000, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote:
>Hello,
>
>It looks like in order to effectively kill the process by Windows means (i.e. what Cygwin "kill -f" is supposed to do),
>the process handle must be obtained with the SYNCHRONIZE right (in addition to PROCESS_TERMINATE), otherwise
>WaitForSingleObject() fails with code 5, permission denied (at least for a regular user, i.e. not an administrator).
>
>That's about this portion of kill.cc located at winsup\utils:
>
> HANDLE h = OpenProcess (PROCESS_TERMINATE, FALSE, (DWORD) dwpid);
> if (!h)
> {
> if (!wait || GetLastError () != ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER)
> fprintf (stderr, "%s: couldn't open pid %u\n",
> prog_name, (unsigned) dwpid);
> return;
> }
> if (!wait || WaitForSingleObject (h, 200) != WAIT_OBJECT_0)
> if (sig && !TerminateProcess (h, sig << 8)
> && WaitForSingleObject (h, 200) != WAIT_OBJECT_0)
> fprintf (stderr, "%s: couldn't kill pid %u, %lu\n",
> prog_name, (unsigned) dwpid, GetLastError ());
>
>MSDN is in agreement with the observed behavior (access denied),
>
>http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms684320%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
>
><quote>
>The handle returned by the OpenProcess function can be used in any function that requires a handle to a process, such as the wait functions, provided the appropriate access rights were requested.
></quote>
>
>http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms684880%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
If only there was some way to programatically supply a change in source
code from party A which could be applied to the source code by party B,
along with a description which logs the change. Nah. Maybe we'll have
something when the Singularity finally occurs.
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple