This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Am 27.03.2012 10:36 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:I suspect the EU commission could track down the right people at MS if they were to decide that SUA/cygwin interop were important. Unfortunately, it would have been much better for that issue to be raised (a) while MS was still whimpering from the smackdown and (b) before the announcement that SUA will be deprecated in Win8, after being essentially unusable for several years before that.Needless to say that the ultimately most efficient way would be to find a method to avoid rebase problems after fork at all. The last attempt at it looked promising at first, but then again... http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/windowsgeneraldevelopmentissues/thread/afdf1b68-1f3e-47f5-94cf-51e397afe073You'd think all the statements about interoperability after the EU anti-trust cases would apply to Cygwin as well.
If SUA can, Cygwin should as well: "Microsoft shall ensure that third-party software products can interoperate with Microsoftâs Relevant Software Products using the same Interoperability Information on an equal footing as other Microsoft Software Products. (âInteroperability Commitmentâ)". http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2009/dec09/12-16Statement.mspx
Conveniently, nothing except a press contact is given on that page.
-- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |