Re: Use of acl on smb related filesystems

[Andrew DeFaria <Andrew at DeFaria dot com>]

On 1/24/2012 1:47 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> It's probably because your FS doesn't support ACLs.  Your mount
> output
>
>    //fs-irva-82/adefaria on /home/adefaria type netapp (binary,user)
>
> shows that the path points to a NetApp drive.  NetApp drives have
> various modes.  They can behave like FAT, NTFS, or a POSIX filesystem.
>  From your other report I assume it's set up not to support ACLs.
> What does
>
>    $ /usr/lib/csih/getVolInfo //fs-irva-82/adefaria
>
> print?
Ltsdo-adefaria:/usr/lib/csih/getVolInfo //fs-irva-82/adefaria
Device Type        : 7
Characteristics    : 10
Volume Name        : <CIFS.HOMEDIR>
Serial Number      : 0
Max Filenamelength : 255
Filesystemname     : <FAT>
Flags              : 40007
  FILE_CASE_SENSITIVE_SEARCH  : TRUE
  FILE_CASE_PRESERVED_NAMES   : TRUE
  FILE_UNICODE_ON_DISK        : TRUE
  FILE_PERSISTENT_ACLS        : FALSE
  FILE_FILE_COMPRESSION       : FALSE
  FILE_VOLUME_QUOTAS          : FALSE
  FILE_SUPPORTS_SPARSE_FILES  : FALSE
  FILE_SUPPORTS_REPARSE_POINTS: FALSE
  FILE_SUPPORTS_REMOTE_STORAGE: FALSE
  FILE_VOLUME_IS_COMPRESSED   : FALSE
  FILE_SUPPORTS_OBJECT_IDS    : FALSE
  FILE_SUPPORTS_ENCRYPTION    : FALSE
  FILE_NAMED_STREAMS          : TRUE
  FILE_READ_ONLY_VOLUME       : FALSE
  FILE_SEQUENTIAL_WRITE_ONCE  : FALSE
  FILE_SUPPORTS_TRANSACTIONS  : FALSE

My guess is that FILE_PERSISTENT_ACLS: FALSE is not a good sign.

Is this related to this thread: 
http://old.nabble.com/NetAPP---cygwin-1.7.7-1-avoid-Recycle-BIN-dot-files-td30236482.html?

In the next reply you advocate me getting a more recent "snapshot". Did 
you mean a more recent "release" or do you want me to move to 
"snapshots" (which I assume are sorta like betas. Skimming some of the 
history (sorry I have a meeting fast approaching) this seems like a 
fairly recent development. Has there been a resolution? (Gotta go, will 
check back later).
--
Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
If you can't be kind, at least have the decency to be vague.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple