This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: ocaml: patches needed
- From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz at users dot sourceforge dot net>
- To: cygwin <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:14:51 -0500
- Subject: Re: ocaml: patches needed
- References: <1439640916.139526.1286812910597.JavaMail.root@zmbs1.inria.fr> <3F718711-595B-44C5-B2A8-61CF29BA00A4@inria.fr>
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 15:47 +0200, Damien Doligez wrote:
> I think it's a bad idea to have something named "ocaml" that doesn't
> implement the full upstream package. What I will do instead is:
>
> ocaml-base for the system except camlp4
> ocaml-camlp4 for camlp4
> ocaml an empty helper package that depends on ocaml-base and ocaml-camlp4
>
> I'm not sure what to name the base package: it could be ocaml-base or
> ocaml-core. Is there a generally-accepted naming convention for such
> cases?
No, but Debian uses ocaml-base, so I'd suggest that.
Yaakov
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple