This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
So here is an example of a performance gain by not using cygwin stat(). I did this patch in about an hour (with the help of some git code), so I wouldn't recommend it for any production use.
On a dry run rsync from my local drive to my NAS (105GB, 34k files, 4k directories). The current release cygwin rsync did it in [36m:43s], with the patch (below) applied, it dropped to [04m:48s].
But your patch only does a portion of the work that stat() is supposed to do. I don't think there's any question that ignoring the need to fill in certain stat fields will save time. But that's not really a workable alternative either, if that's what you're implying.
-- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746
Q: Are you sure?A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
-- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |