This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: libtool 2.2.6a: LDFLAGS ignored when building a shared lib?
- From: Charles Wilson <cygwin at cwilson dot fastmail dot fm>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:09:55 -0500
- Subject: Re: libtool 2.2.6a: LDFLAGS ignored when building a shared lib?
- References: <20090209120543.GD5416@calimero.vinschen.de>
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I have a problem using libtool 2.2.6a. I've just tried to build the
> latest file(1) for Cygwin 1.7 using gcc-4. Since gcc-4 is still in flux
> I decided to build with a static libgcc. First I reconfed the file
> source tree so that the latest libtool is used. This worked fine,
> configure and make succeeded. However, here's the one puzzeling problem
> I have. I'm unable to build using the -static-libgcc flag. I tried to
> add it to LDFLAGS, then to CFLAGS, then to both. For some reason this
> flag is filtered out when gcc gets called to link the shared lib.
[snip]
> So there's the `-static-libgcc' twice in the libtool comamnd line when
> called from make. But when libtool calls gcc, nothing's left of it. I
> understand why CFLAGS is missing, but why did it filter out LDFLAGS as
> well? And, if that's normal, why, and how do I workaround that?
I believe it is a long-standing bug, mentioned here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2005-10/msg00004.html
but IIRC the promised patch was never produced.
Try Ralf's suggested workaround, configuring your entire package with
CC='gcc -static-libcc' and/or CXX='g++ -static-libgcc'.
If that works, then I'll ping Ralf on fixing this bug.
--
Chuck
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/