This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: SIGKILL vs. 1.7.0 snapshot
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:48:18 -0500
- Subject: Re: SIGKILL vs. 1.7.0 snapshot
- References: <loom.20081126T193327-7@post.gmane.org>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 07:36:17PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote:
>I'm not sure in which snapshot this regression crept in, but kill is now having
>problems sending SIGKILL:
>
>C:\cygwin\bin>.\bash -c 'kill -9 $$'
>C:\cygwin\bin>echo %ERRORLEVEL%
>2304
>C:\cygwin\bin>cd ..\..\cygwin-2\bin
>C:\cygwin-2\bin>.\bash -c 'kill -9 $$'
> 1 [sig] bash 3376 _cygtls::handle_exceptions: Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIO
>LATION
> 19440 [sig] bash 3376 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to bash.exe.stac
>kdump
>C:\cygwin-2\bin>echo %ERRORLEVEL%
>35584
I introduced the regression. I'll fix it ASAP.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/