This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: {octave,octave-doc,octave-devel}-3.0.1-1 and octave-forge-20080507-1
- From: Marco Atzeri <marco_atzeri at yahoo dot it>
- To: "Yaakov \(Cygwin Ports\)" <yselkowitz at users dot sourceforge dot net>, cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:06:06 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: {octave,octave-doc,octave-devel}-3.0.1-1 and octave-forge-20080507-1
--- "Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)" ha scritto:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Marco Atzeri wrote:
> | --- "Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)" ha scritto:
> |> Since .oct files are just DLLs, should they be
> |> treated as such by cygport (and perhaps
> rebaseall)?
> |
> | I am not sure about what you mean.
> | Could you clarify a bit?
>
> cygport would:
> * strip(1) them before packaging;
> * check them with objdump(1) for binary
> dependencies.
>
> rebaseall would
> * rebase them together with other .dll and .so
> libraries.
>
>
> Yaakov
strip and dependencies are useful in any case.
Strip seems to reduce the oct around 50% less.
Should I add something to my cygport script, or a
patch to cygport package is needed ?
Regards
Marco
___________________________________
Scopri il Blog di Yahoo! Mail: trucchi, novità, consigli... e la tua opinione!
http://www.ymailblogit.com/blog/
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/