This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]
- From: infoterror <infoterror at fastmail dot fm>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 15:16:30 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]
- References: <58fb98730601070837k26ad68f5l@mail.gmail.com> <43BFEFB9.EA24C5B4@dessent.net> <5718434.post@talk.nabble.com> <003001c6bb9a$4e15b140$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <5732487.post@talk.nabble.com> <20060809210958.GA3815@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <002101c6bc53$07062af0$1702a8c0@itefixb> <20060810133910.GB10459@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <000401c6bc94$fe3f70b0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0608101213460.408@access1.cims.nyu.edu> <001e01c6bcb5$31979d00$1702a8c0@itefixb> <20060810195748.GA8065@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <003701c6bcc8$3b846010$1702a8c0@itefixb> <20060811010602.GC11554@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Christopher Faylor-2 wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if you got my point or not but if you don't develop an
> installer which deals with categories and dependencies, then I don't see
> how it could be considered a replacement for setup.exe. If you do this,
> then you don't need to list all of the packages in "Base". You just
> need to know that there is a "Base" and deal with that.
>
You've been carrying this axe to grind for a long time. Why not accept that
you're dealing with a different paradigm and get off your pretentious high
horse?
FYI
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Cygintl-3.dll-was-not-found-tf869884.html#a7124766
Sent from the Cygwin Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/