Re: Serious performance problems (malloc related?)

["Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit at familiehaase dot de>]

Andy Ross wrote:
> But as I noted in my original post: It's not waiting on the disk
> reads.  Comment out the split() call and watch the delays disappear.
> Raw I/O speed in cygwin is comparable to mingw or MSVC.  The overhead
> is due, somehow, to activity within/under split().  Other than
> allocation, that function doesn't do any meaningful library
> interaction that I can see (although Vaclav's suggestion about
> exception handling is a very good one...).

Can you port the testcase you provided to C to see if it makes a
difference, please?


Gerrit
--
=^..^=

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/