This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [patch] several new features for cygrunsrv
- From: Brian Dessent <brian at dessent dot net>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 14:38:42 -0700
- Subject: Re: [patch] several new features for cygrunsrv
- References: <428CE837.C00E288B@dessent.net> <20050519203046.GH2794@calimero.vinschen.de>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I really like this patch, cool stuff. However, I have two nits.
>
> First, your patch adds new options, so it should also add some wording to
> cygrunsrv.README.
>
> On May 19 12:25, Brian Dessent wrote:
> > for S in `cygrunsrv -L`; do cygrunsrv -E $S; done
> >
> > If a service name contains spaces it will be double-quoted.
>
> I gave the -L option a quick test and to my surprise, no service got
> printed. The problem was apparently that I was not running /bin/cygrunsrv,
> but the cygrunsrv I've just built in my builddir. To recognize the
> services as a Cygwin service, the list function uses the full path to
> cygrunsrv. I'm wondering if comparing the basename wouldn't be better
> for debugging purposes? This is also more aligned to the -Q option which
> prints services also if it's not the "right" cygrunsrv asking for them.
Yes, I ran into that myself as well and then forgot to put the basename
check in. I also found a bug or two. I'll send you another patch later
that fixes all the above.
Do you think the idea of having cygcheck include the --list --verbose
output is worthwhile? I'll see to doing that if it's agreeable.
Brian
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/