Re: pwd vs $PWD, bash, cygwin vs Linux

[Peter Farley <pjfarley3 at yahoo dot com>]

But what if it is *not* your Makefile, but someone
else's, e.g. the many GNU source packages that expect
bash behavior?  Surely you don't intend that ordinary
users (well, OK, anyone compiling from a source
package isn't really "ordinary") should modify every
package maintained by GNU in order to make it under
cygwin, do you?

With respect,

Peter

P.S. - If there have already been discussions or if
there already exists documentation on why ash vs. bash
(I gather it is for performance reasons), I'd
appreciate (a) pointer(s) so I could better learn the
history so I don't re-hash settled issues.

--- Christopher Faylor
<cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com> wrote:
<Snipped> 
> I really don't understand why using CURDIR isn't
> the ultimate solution here.  If you can mess with
> your mount table or copy bash to sh, then
> you really should be able to also change your
> Makefile to use $(CURDIR) rather than $$PWD.



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/