Re: /proc functionality; ls errors

[Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>]

On Feb  1 22:00, linda w wrote:
> Cool - does that mean it was a bug and was fixed, or did it just
> happen to disappear due to some other improvement?  Either way...

It was a bug which just didn't show up with ls from the old fileutils.

> 'bout how long does it take till things go from CVS to a release,
> these days.

Usually within the same year.

>   I've tried twice to build from CVS, but never seem
> to have gotten a full build to run w/no errors (not to mention having
> a woefully inadequate machine to build such a project on...(sigh)).

Did you read http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html#SEC104 lately?  Otherwise,
as Brian wrote, try a snapshot.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/