cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

[Robert Collins]

On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 08:21, Brian Ford wrote:
> However, if you already had the old monolithic gcc package when updating
> to the new separate front end packages, then it is a setup/gcc dependency
> bug and you should have gotten gcc-g++.

What did you put in the setup.hint that makes you think setup would do
version specific dependencies for the *old version* ?

Setup will do per-version dependencies, but it does so *for the target
version*.

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/attachments/20031113/250aeb0a/attachment.sig>