This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Please try the latest snapshot -- it is close to cygwin 1.5.6


Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 05:37:36PM +0100, Philippe Torche wrote:

Christopher Faylor wrote:

The subject says it all.

I'm hoping to release cygwin 1.5.6 shortly after Christmas.

I've tested it (CVS version 12:35 GMT + 1) on our 4 Xeon on W2003S and unfortunately my previous test case (run_t.sh and t.sh) always fails.
I've replace bash with sh and no problem anymore (not have wait enough maybe) ! A bash bug ?


Let me be extremely clear about this again: I don't have a 4 Xeon
processor running W2003S.  I will not be able to test this and I,
frankly, don't care much about this corner case -- especially if it is
not a regression from previous releases.

So, if you were just reporting this as a data point, then thanks.  If
you are expecting me to do something about it, then, you will,
unfortunately, be disappointed.
:-( Not you but other maybe ! If you show old threads, I'm not alone with this problem ! I can't give access to a multi CPU computer (client machine), but maybe somebody can ?


The test suite runs soon happily (except now 3 cases) with my Athlon on WinXP, and I'm preparing to run it tomorrow on our 4 Xeon.
:-) The test case give me the same result


I think I will have to give a gold star to the person who figures out
why those three cases are "failing".  It really isn't that hard.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]