This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: DDD 3.3.7 compiles ootb (was - RE: DDD 3.3.5 success)
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:12:29AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >Now, does anyone care to package it? ;-)
>
> Haven't I already vetoed this once?
> cgf
Not that I recall. I believe you vetoed cgdb (as Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
mentioned already). If you did, I apologize. If not, I'm assuming you're
planning to.
May I inquire why you propose to veto this package? FWICS, there are some
clear advantages to using DDD over insight in some contexts (e.g., insight
is a frontend for gdb only, whereas DDD handles other debuggers, as stated
on the list recently; insight is a Win32 app, whereas DDD is an X app;
possibly others). FWIW, I'd vote for it.
In any case, this discussion is moot until someone volunteers to maintain
it and posts a package proposal to cygwin-apps. Perhaps this needs to be
continued on that list once this happens, unless you've already decided to
veto the package no matter what.
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor@watson.ibm.com
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/