This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bug with setup.exe: saw tetex-beta even though I did not selectprev

From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke at gnu dot org>
To: Robert Collins <rbcollins at cygwin dot com>
Cc: rainer dot typke at cs dot uu dot nl, cygwin at cygwin dot com
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 23:00:37 +0200
Subject: Re: bug with setup.exe: saw tetex-beta even though I did not selectprev
Organization: Jan at Appel
References: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0304031227120.21921-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu><87n0j050ts.fsf@peder.flower> <1049834756.893.89.camel@localhost>

Robert Collins <rbcollins at cygwin dot com> writes:

> Anyway, I still don't see what went wrong - the user selected tetex, and
> got tetex. tetex-beta wasn't installed, and shouldn't have been.

As I understand it, Rainer selected tetex-beta (because thought that
must be newer), changed his mind, selected tetex instead.  Then,
tetex didn't work because neither of tetex-tiny/tetex-base got
installed.

Rainer, is that correct?

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke at gnu dot org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

References:
- Re: bug with setup.exe: saw tetex-beta even though I did not select prev
  - From: Igor Pechtchanski
- Re: bug with setup.exe: saw tetex-beta even though I did not selectprev
  - From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
- Re: bug with setup.exe: saw tetex-beta even though I did notselect prev
  - From: Robert Collins

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]