Re: ObjectiveC

[Steve Núñez <nunez at helios dot net>]

Great, so at last we know the situation. My question is "What has 
changed?". I seem to recall ObjcC as part of the 2.95 gcc release, and I'm 
just wondering if there's is some fundamental difficulty in gcc3 that has 
caused it's removal?

Unfortunately, I don't have the time to make a package, even if we could. I 
would like to use ObjC on Cygwin though.

        - Steve

At 06:39 PM 11/28/2002 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 09:27:52AM -0600, Dockeen wrote:
> >"Well this needs to be integrated INTO gcc"
> >
> >Uhhh, only one problem with this statement, its not right.  Going to the gcc
> >web site,
> >I find:
> >
> >"GCC is the GNU Compiler Collection, which currently contains front ends
> >for C, C++, Objective-C, Fortran, Java, and Ada"
> >
> >Which is consistent with discussions I had on another board with a developer
> >that uses ObjectiveC.
> >
> >Check out the gcc sites:
> >http://gcc.gnu.org/
> >
> >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/
> >
> >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/
>
> Yep, these are all fascinating arguments.  However, I'm not going to be
> including Objective-C into gcc.  I will be breaking out things into
> different packages at some point as soon as I get motivated to do so.
> It is certainly not impossible for someone to build their own Objective
> C package and I certainly wouldn't object to someone else doing it.
>
> cgf
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/