This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: Re[2]: setup-2.243 Crash / Install from Local Directory / WinXP




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pavel Tsekov [mailto:ptsekov@syntrex.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:28 AM
> To: Cliff Hones
> Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re[2]: setup-2.243 Crash / Install from Local 
> Directory / WinXP
> 
> 
> Hello Cliff,
> 
> Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 4:22:57 PM, you wrote:
> 
> CH> Robert Collins <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au> wrote:
> 
> >> C'mon Max, you *know* I need more detail than that.
> >> 
> >> Install from Local works fine here. Even though it's only 
> a snapshot, 
> >> I wasn't aware of any -bugs- in the release.
> 
> CH> Why doesn't 
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-> 05/msg01210.html count 
> CH> 
> as a bug?  Is it because it was on W98?
> 
> I've been tracing the exception with a disassembler - I'm not 
> quite positve why exactly does the fault occur, but I can say 
> for sure that it was caused from some code inside 
> LogSingleton or LogFile classes. Maybe an exception being 
> thrown from one of these... I can't be sure because it seems 
> that the source provided along with the binary snapshot is 
> not exactly the same as the one from which the binary was 
> compiled... Robert, can you confirm/deny this assumption ?

The source provided is the source that binary was created from. I use
the build script I posted to create snapshots, and it uses make dist to
create the source package.

Rob

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]