This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: "start" for Cygwin
I think there was a start.exe in Win9x/Me (i.e. it was not a command.com
builtin), but my Win9x days are mercifully over, so I can't say for sure.
Nevertheless, a cygutils start could be a useful scripting tool.
> Ah -- and that explains why one previously had to do "cmd /c start foo"
> from a bash shell. Okay, according to my tests (I put a 'start' shell
> script in my /usr/bin directory.) From bash, 'start foo' causes my
> script to run. From cmd, 'start foo' causes the builtin cmd command to
> run (even tho D:/cygwin/bin is in the front of my PATH).
>
> This is good -- I withdraw my objection (such as it was).
>
> Anybody else think this is a good cygutil? I think it *probably* is...
>
> --Chuck
>
>
> Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > Start is a cmd builtin - there is no start.exe
> >
> > Rob
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Charles Wilson [mailto:cwilson@ece.gatech.edu]
> >>
> > Anyway, I personally have no objection to including start in cygutils --
> >
> > but the sudden appearance of a 'start.exe' command in /usr/bin (which
> > could hide WINNT/start.exe) may cause consternation in some quarters.
> >
> > FYI, I've just completed the following HOW-TO-CONTRIBUTE (to cygutils)
> > document. It will show up in /usr/doc/cygutils-X.Y.Z/ in the next
> > release of cygutils.
> >
> > --Chuck
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/