This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: no more package moratorium?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf@redhat.com>
>
> >I think we should either get a consensus from all the package
> >maintainers, or perhaps, wait 3 days for objections. If no
objections,
> >then the package is allowed in. If there are objections, discuss
until
> >resolved. To prevent deadlock, a single individual objecting will not
> >cause a package to be rejected, the objections must be agreed with by
> >other package maintainers.
>
> As long as I get veto power or whatever the opposite of veto power,
> that's fine with me. I'm not exactly Linus in this situation, I
guess.
Well in this situation you are a package maintainer - the cygwin
package. Just object :].
> I'm not sure that we really need to be this formal, though. Who's
going
> to be doing the tracking?
How many new packages are we going to get? I can easily keep a notepad
list of packages that have had someone put their hand up for, and every
3 days delete 1 day off the list.
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/