This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (was: two problems with cygwin's zip)
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Subject: Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (was: two problems with cygwin's zip)
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:19:52 -0400
- References: <993648794.12881.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com> <3B39F797.7000608@gruntose.com> <20010627131157.C22088@redhat.com>
- Reply-To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:11:57PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>i'm satisfied for now that the polarization against win32 wildcards is
>>such that only a patch which can be analyzed would even have a chance
>>of changing any opinions. expect that the issue may re-arise and
>>include some code for consideration in a month or two.
>
>I'm sorry that that statement caused you to feel that way. It was
>a very poor choice of language on my part.
Hah! Poor reading skills strike again. I didn't fully parse your words above.
You are 100% correct. A patch is without a doubt the most persuasive argument
you can offer.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/