This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Too large cygwin entry in termcap file
- To: Alois Steindl <Alois dot Steindl+e325 at tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Subject: Re: Too large cygwin entry in termcap file
- From: Christopher Faylor <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 17:17:59 -0400
- Cc: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- References: <3B2685FD.4010801@tuwien.ac.at>
- Reply-To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
Please check out the project web page for links to available information
and ports: http://cygwin.com/ .
If you don't see what you need there, then the cygwin mailing list is
the best place to make observations or get questions answered.
Information on the mailing list is available at the project web page.
For your convenience, I've reset the Reply-To: address to point to the
cygwin mailing list. I've also Cc'ed this reply there.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:13:33PM +0200, Alois Steindl wrote:
>Hello,
>when I tried to compile the fweb package with cygwin
>(according to log file version cygwin-1.1.8-2) I experienced strange
>problems with the calls to tgetent.
>
>So I got the most recent termcap source distribution (20001020-1)
>and played with it. The problems (STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION)
>remained the same. When I switched to a different TERM
>variable, eg vt100, the problem disappeared.
>
>It seems to me that the linux and cygwin entries in the
>termcap file are longer than 1024 characters, which could be the
>cause of the problem. After increasing the corresponding
>array size, the program ran successfully.
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple