This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: 1.3.1: Objective-C not installed.
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Subject: Re: 1.3.1: Objective-C not installed.
- From: MarketLogix <mlx at mlx dot com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 16:49:43 -0700
- References: <BE020C49D751D3119E0B009027305015020938C7@goldmail.golder.com><20010518202528.B11048@redhat.com><6363-Sat19May2001085745+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk><20010519103623.B7115@redhat.com>
- Reply-To: mlx at san dot rr dot com
Hmmm ...
Other than the fact that Cygnus/Redhat has been commenting the ObjC
dependencies out of (their versions of) the production GNU makefiles
since I can remember (cygwin 1.6) - there really are no problems with
building or using it.
I think Cygnus/Redhat just doesn't see enough of a "market" to bother
keeping it bundled as GNU has in the main distribution for the last
decade or so. A talented and willing ObjC guru has not stepped forward to
contribute the bindings, for proper demangling and such, to cygwin
development tools like gdb. Hence, Cygnus/Redhat has finally completely
swept it out of their distribution. Oh well, that's progress I guess.
ObjC has been "just barely supported" within gcc pretty much since its
inception. Its truly a "programmer's" programming language.
Nonetheless,
As of gcc 2.95.2, I can guarantee - it works just fine on BSD,
linux, Sun/Solaris, NeXT and yes, cygwin-translated win32 as well.
Viva ObjC !!!
bisk.
Begin forwarded message:
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-mlx=san.rr.com@sources.redhat.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>,
<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 10:36:23 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: 1.3.1: Objective-C not installed.
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <6363-Sat19May2001085745+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>; from
starksb@ebi.ac.uk on Sat, May 19, 2001 at 08:57:44AM +0100
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 08:57:44AM +0100, David Starks-Browning wrote:
>On Friday 18 May 01, Christopher Faylor writes:
>> >What can I do to get Objective-C for my installation of Cygwin?
>>
>> You have to build one yourself. I don't distribute it with gcc 2.95.3 and
>> have no plans on doing so.
>
>I don't know what the Objective-C compiler is or why people think it
>should be part of Cygwin's gcc-2.95, but I've seen this question come
>up a few times recently. Should I add it to the FAQ?
Yes, please.
The basic reason it is not included is that I had problems building it
at one point. I also think that when it was built there were problems
with it. Objective C is just barely supported in the main distribution,
AFAICT.
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple