This is the mail archive of the cygwin@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: "The PATH problem"

To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
Subject: Re: "The PATH problem"
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:44:20 -0500
References: <3A5F15A2.F8D56ABC@yahoo.com> <3A5E927F.7009.7C9D21F@localhost> <3A5F15A2.F8D56ABC@yahoo.com> <20010112095045.F8279@redhat.com> <4.3.1.2.20010112102902.0226c948@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
Reply-To: cygwin at cygwin dot com

On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 10:31:13AM -0500, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
>At 09:50 AM 1/12/2001, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>What kind of UNIX emulation would Cygwin be if you couldn't modify your
>>PATH???
>
>
>This is clearly a rhetorical question but in case anyone isn't sure, the 
>answer to the question is "a bad one", which Cygwin certainly is NOT.
>
>(...now back to modifying my path from bash...;-))

Phew.  I wasn't sure.  Thanks for clarifying this issue.  :-)

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

References:
- Re: "The PATH problem"
  - From: Earnie Boyd
- RE: "The PATH problem"
  - From: Soren Andersen
- Re: "The PATH problem"
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: "The PATH problem"
  - From: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]