Re: Net version 1.1.0: gcc 2.95.2-2 compiler bug

["Ulrich Jakobus" <u dot jakobus at web dot de>]

Hello,

concerning the following problem:

> On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 01:42:35PM -1000, Jim Heasley wrote:
> >In porting some astronomical data handling software from linux/unix to
> >Cygwin (the latest nework release, 1.1.0 I believe), I discovered an
> >error in how gcc 2.95.2-2 generates output of a floating or double
> >variable set to 0.0 when formatted with a %E format.  I didn't get any
> >hits on this problem in the FAQ or mail lists.  The following little
> >test program illustrates the problem:
>
> To investigate this problem, please check out the 'newlib' part of the
> cygwin package.  That's where things like printf are implemented.
> 
> cgf

Please see the earlier discussions about that problem in 
this mailing list:

 - cygwin-1.1.2: printf("%e") broken
   http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2000-06/msg00358.html

 - Latest gcc/cygwin - bug in %e format specifier?
   http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2000-06/msg00730.html

 - Re: Latest gcc/cygwin - bug in %e format specifier?
   http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2000-06/msg00745.html

The last reference has a fix in vfprintf.c:

2000-06-15  DJ Delorie  <dj@cygnus.com>

        * libc/stdio/vfprintf.c: pad 0.0 correctly with %e


Ulrich




--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com