This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re[2]: cygwin on 95 slower than NT
- To: "Fraxinus" <fraxinus at home dot se>
- Subject: Re[2]: cygwin on 95 slower than NT
- From: Paul Sokolovsky <paul-ml at is dot lg dot ua>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:38:02 +0200
- CC: cygwin at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <007701bf3ab4$96b26060$500616ac@storebror>
- Reply-To: Paul Sokolovsky <paul-ml at is dot lg dot ua>
Hello Fraxinus,
Fraxinus <fraxinus@home.se> wrote:
F> Isnt it that all console programs under '95 runs slower. I noticed it first
F> in batch files...
Of course they're slower. But how much slower? I bet they're
hundred times slower (in screen output, of course) than DOS apps
(djgpp's, for example). But why make them times more slower?
Aproximative tests:
ls'ing directory with 256 entries (all dirs) (seconds)
ls
pw32 win95/P5-100/24 0.7
linux 2.0 P5-150/48 0.02
Cygwin b20.1 win95/P5-100/24 2.42
ls -l
pw32 win95/P5-100/24 5.42
linux 2.0 P5-150/48 2.82
Cygwin b20.1 win95/P5-100/24 13.28
where pw32 is my implementation
F> / Hugo Ahlenius
Best regards,
Paul mailto:paul-ml@is.lg.ua
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com