This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Re: Newbie C Questions
- To: "cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com" <cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com>
- Subject: Re: Re: Newbie C Questions
- From: Chris Faylor <cgf@cygnus.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 12:05:12 -0400
- References: <DMDLODHCLHACCAAA@my-deja.com>
- Reply-To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 04:24:53AM -0700, Clark Sims wrote:
>On Tue, 24 Aug 1999 22:54:10 Chris Faylor wrote:
>>On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 09:58:00PM +0200, Michael Hirmke wrote:
>>>>I use the Watcom compiler, but I can't get it to
>>>>compile with the Cygnus port of GCC. The include
>>>>file conio.h is not being found. conio.h exists
>>>>in one of the subdirectories of Cygnus, but GCC
>>>
>>>Your setup seems to be, uhm a bit chaotic.
>>>Please paste the output of
>>> cygcheck -s -v -r
>>>to a mail to this list. Perhaps we can see, what's
>>>going wrong.
>>
>>Actually, I'm confused by the wording here. How do you get a
>>Watcom compiler to compile using a cygnus port of gcc?
>
>wcl386 mypg.c
And, that compiles mypg.c with the Watcom compiler. What does cygwin
have to do with this?
>>What does Watcom have to do with Cygwin gcc?
>
>They both produce WIN32 code, which runs well under an NT system. I
>like to run compilers in parallel as a check on one another. The
>Watcom compiler is good because it is pretty ANSI compilent, and it is
>very stable (few bugs). Too bad Sybase has killed it. Sybase's
>actions are responcible for me switching to freeware and openware.
Uh huh. I'm still not getting what Watcom has to do with anything.
If you're having a problem accessing an include file via gcc, then
this has nothing to do with Watcom.
-chris
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com