RE: size_of_stack_reserve SEGV

[Heribert Dahms <heribert_dahms@icon-gmbh.de>]

Hi Chris,

oh, I got it!
My point is that under Unix, analyzing the complete core file
may save hours needed for rerunning from the very beginning
under gdb. I also understand that nobody has yet contributed
core file support as expected from Unix. Sorry, I've not the time...

Bye, Heribert (heribert_dahms@icon-gmbh.de)

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	'Chris Faylor' [SMTP:cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com]
> Sent:	Sunday, August 01, 1999 02:04
> To:	Heribert Dahms
> Cc:	cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
> Subject:	Re: size_of_stack_reserve SEGV
> 
> On Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 02:00:25AM +0200, Heribert Dahms wrote:
> >Hi Chris,
> >
> >exactly like under Unix?
> >Does "gdb foo core" work now as expected?
> 
> I didn't say to do 'gdb foo core'.  I said:
> 
> "Run.  Your.  Program."
> 
> That would be:
> 
> gdb foo
> run
> 
> Got it?  It's really really simple.
> 
> cgf
> 
> [Heribert]  [snip]
> 

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com