This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: What about RSXNT instead of cygwin32???
- To: gnu-win32 at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: What about RSXNT instead of cygwin32???
- From: Weiqi Gao <weiqigao at a dot crl dot com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 19:43:08 -0500
- Organization: Spectrum Healthcare Services
- References: <3442267F.D80D15EE@brokat.de>
Bernd Schilpp wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> Does anybody know about the RSXNT-Compiler ?
> I tried to get my stuff compiled with cygwin32 - but I have some
> problems, because the libaries are not threadsave, the socket-problems
> and so on.
> And there are always new problems reported in the mailinglist - you know
> it.
>
> Now I found
> RSXNT-Compiler(ftp://ftp.uni-bielefeld.de/pub/systems/msdos/misc/
> or http://www.sjc.ox.ac.uk/users/williams/).
> The list of bugs and missing features is very short. The Libaries are
> threadsave and it seems to work quite good.
> Does anybody know the big difference to cygwin32 or is anybody
> experienced with RSXNT ? Are any problems known ?
> Please let me know your opinion.
RSXNTDJ v.1.31 and DJGPP v2.01 (not exactly RSXNT, I know) worked really
well on Windows 95 machines as a Win32 compiler. You won't e able to
port UNIX code quite easily as you could with GNU-Win32 though.
--
Weiqi Gao
weiqigao@a.crl.com
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".