This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: cygcheck's understanding of TZ
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:45:49 -0400
- Subject: Re: cygcheck's understanding of TZ
- References: <BANLkTikhZ+tHjNzWZNM9VKN6b0Ei84FeWQ@mail.gmail.com> <20110613153344.GA19880@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <716EA16C9FD24A4CBE13D1A01AAF3747@cit.wayne.edu> <20110614152814.GA3123@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <C1B47AA594E44D809B9AD0D7925E6065@cit.wayne.edu> <4DF79F82.7070205@metaed.com> <4C1F3C3BB7EC455F9FE3D08A28DE58F6@cit.wayne.edu> <4DF7B430.4010508@metaed.com> <20110614192147.GB15316@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A209ED1BF935@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov>
- Reply-to: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Reply-to: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 06:03:57PM -0400, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote on Tuesday, June 14, 2011 3:22 PM
>> Ok. We're now inexplicably looping back to the beginning
>> of the discussion. Please consider this thread officially
>> terminated.
>
>So cygwin-talk is appropriate?
>
>What about giving both? People could choose what they want or need.
>
>Might one just add something like line from
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-06/msg00107.html
>printf ("Current System Time (UTC): %s\n", asctime (gmtime (&now)));
>
>Not that I care, but the OP seems to.
Still looping:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-06/msg00129.html
The OP may care but he hasn't explained why he cares. Without an
explanation, I see no reason to pursue a patch to make things work
better for him.
Please give this a rest.
cgf