This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: mk_all
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 09:52:30 -0400
- Subject: Re: mk_all
- References: <31655700.post@talk.nabble.com> <BANLkTimeMMBpMUCzSqGxFBK_D77RAkq6cw@mail.gmail.com> <31657287.post@talk.nabble.com> <BANLkTikE3CJM8rFRDB-1ymrLvX3xXMcC7g@mail.gmail.com> <31658211.post@talk.nabble.com> <BANLkTinYXVNcMZEf2r8fMEasAimn0qYvGw@mail.gmail.com> <31658432.post@talk.nabble.com> <4DD5625E.4000303@redhat.com> <31662386.post@talk.nabble.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Reply-to: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 01:50:15AM -0700, kathy3826 wrote:
>Thanks guys,
>
>it must have been make all. And it seems I can bypass the one with x
>windows using source code.
I think probably replicating the process with consternation hides sea
monkeys.
cgf
(just wanted to get in on this "send incomprehensible statements to
a mailing list" thing - it looks like a lot of perl)