This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: snapshots revisited
- From: Andy Koppe <andy dot koppe at gmail dot com>
- To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:17:55 +0000
- Subject: Re: snapshots revisited
- References: <20110310080923.19244yp07upxphcz@messagerie.si.c-s.fr> <20110310091353.GU12899@calimero.vinschen.de> <20110310232423.GA3588@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20110310232514.GA10198@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20110311082012.GE7064@calimero.vinschen.de> <20110311152511.GB4645@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <COL102-W10B426004D410A3549CE47B5CB0@phx.gbl> <AANLkTinC6ba03h4dk7M=wZD-ZF=kXFBwqOj9NuV-0CC6@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On 11 March 2011 16:12, David Eisner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Karl M wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> >On Mar 10 18:25, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:24:24PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> >> >On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:13:53AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> >> >>On Mar 10 08:09, EXCOFFIER Denis wrote:
>>> >> >>>Also that you replace GMT by UT in this snapshot page.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>I guess you mean UTC. Good point. Chris?
>>> >> >
>>> >> >No comment. I *have*, however, filed this under "Nitpicky things that I
>>> >> >can't believe anyone would send email to a mailing list about."
>>> >>
>>> >> Actually, apologies. I guess the above is a comment.
>>> >
>>> >Actually, yes, it's one of these unnecessary comments which only purpose
>>> >is to kick peoples asses. Therefore it belongs to the cygwin-talk list
>>> >or to /dev/null.
>>>
>>> Wow. Yeah, like this message, for instance. This message could also even
>>> have been sent as a a polite personal note from a codeveloper.
>>>
>> And I always thought of the two of you as the responsible adults on this list. :=)
>
>
> Here's my theory. ÂChris was making a snarky comment about the
> original poster's s/GMT/UT/ comment. ÂBut Corrina interpreted this as
> a comment about *her* s/UT/UTC/ comment, and responded to Chris in the
> same spirit. ÂThey usually (always?) treat each other with respect
> (and in fact Corrina is polite to list members in general, which is
> appreciated.)
Please let the matter rest now and go back to testing snapshots.
Andy