This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: Bug tracker
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:26:48 -0400
- Subject: Re: Bug tracker
- References: <4C6D17E0.5010506@blunn.org> <8cdq66dd6mang9d5oseab1v7l20io5epmi@4ax.com> <20100819141948.GB19001@calimero.vinschen.de> <cmfq66p4d2s88u1foj5s7d13ucg2oda29i@4ax.com> <20100819144931.GD19001@calimero.vinschen.de> <pphq66ptach2iki3bhqb9rp4s46f7g5si6@4ax.com> <4C6D559B.4030108@bopp.net> <20100819173439.GC9090@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4C6D8D33.5070902@bopp.net> <4C6D8FD7.4090506@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Reply-to: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 02:11:03PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>On 08/19/2010 01:59 PM, Jeremy Bopp wrote:
>> Of course the quality of the defect tracker is directly related to the
>> effort the maintainers put in to keep it relatively pruned and
>> organized. Maybe that is too much to expect for most maintainers at
>> this time.
>
>Bingo. That's why I'm perfectly happy with mailing lists and no extra
>burden of a web-based tracker for the packages I maintain on my spare
>time. Why add overhead to a process that already works for me?
Feelthy steenking luddite. You're admitting that you're satisfied with
mediocrity! You probably torture small animals too, just like Dave.
cgf