This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: Using nano in mintty : missing cursor
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:19:36 -0400
- Subject: Re: Using nano in mintty : missing cursor
- References: <380-2201044221364639@M2W120.mail2web.com> <i2y416096c61004221153ra00a1f96m2042e5f8ddde3bea@mail.gmail.com> <20100422201758.GA5081@ghost.local.lan> <l2g416096c61004222257m5c4b4970wc669a7cdc1ffcea4@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Reply-to: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 06:57:06AM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>David Sastre wrote:
>> Hey...before somebody yells ONTAGA! I'd like to know if answering
>> questions related to someone else's mantained packages is seen as
>> unpolite or something...
>>
>> Now yell.
>> :P
>
>ONTAGA!
>
>ONTAGA! ONTAGA!
>
>I've got no idea what that means, but I like the shouting. :)
>
>Of course answers regarding other people's questions are welcome, even
>more so if it means the maintainer doesn't have to get involved. In
>fact, it's a very useful way to contribute to open source projects.
I still think it's a strange question. If you follow it to its logical
conclusion there would only be newbies asking questions and package
maintainers answering them. So an email thread would be:
From: Ed.C@lueless.org
Subject: minTTY porblem
From: Andy Koppe
Subject: Re: mintty porblem
From: Ed.C@lueless.org
Subject: Re: minTTY porblem
From: Andy Koppe
Subject: Re: minTTY porblem
>From Ed.C@luless.org
Subject: Re: minTTY porbem (SOVLED!)
i.e., you'd only ever see two people in every email thread. Clearly
that isn't the case.
But, nevertheless: ONTAGA! ONTAGA I say!
cgf