This is the mail archive of the cygwin-talk mailing list for the cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: b20 = 1.5?

From: Warren Young <warren at etr-usa dot com>
To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:28:21 -0700
Subject: Re: b20 = 1.5?
References: <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A208B2636FC3@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov> <20100122182224.GD31420@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A208B2636FF2@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov>
Reply-to: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>

On 1/22/2010 1:07 PM, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:

Christopher Faylor sent the following at Friday, January 22, 2010 1:22 PM
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:14:27PM -0500, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID)
[E] wrote:
I'm beginning to get the impression that 1.5 will become the new b20.
You're speaking heresy. Stop it now.
cgf
Make me. B20! B20! B20! B20! B20! B20! Nyaa! Ha! Ha! Ha!

*cgf throws lightning bolt*...Zot.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: b20 = 1.5?
  - From: phil song

References:
- b20 = 1.5?
  - From: Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
- Re: b20 = 1.5?
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- RE: b20 = 1.5?
  - From: Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]