This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: GCC4, new package soon?
- From: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
- To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk Rampaging List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:42:39 +0100
- Subject: Re: GCC4, new package soon?
- References: <20090813083945.GH13438@calimero.vinschen.de> <4A842996.3050108@gmail.com> <4A850F1E.2030707@users.sourceforge.net> <4A8562EA.5010504@gmail.com> <4A85A745.4050003@users.sourceforge.net> <4A85B39D.3000502@gmail.com> <4A85C2AA.1080105@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20090814200705.GA10492@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4A85C871.7050106@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
- Reply-to: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
Charles Wilson wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 04:01:46PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>> There are a ton of things wrong with this behavior, but it is what it is
>>> -- and somehow we need to work around it, until libtool is "fixed".
>>> Whatever "fixed" means.
>> find / -name 'libtool*' -o -name 'lt*' | xargs rm
>
> Ouch. Harsh.
>
> At the risk of having a technical discussion on the talk list, I wonder
> what the ramifications would be of just not shipping .la files for the
> gcc runtime libs?
Libtool will summon Moth-Ra to destroy Tokyo. Happy now?
cheers,
DaveK