This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: buildrrot compoilatio
- From: Igor Peshansky <pechtcha at cs dot nyu dot edu>
- To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:26:07 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: buildrrot compoilatio
- References: <78aeb6ba0706182244j6f0fe49dh151f8b4427c8e433@mail.gmail.com> <78aeb6ba0706182246v5caac59ma4e9df6258330ae8@mail.gmail.com> <04c801c7b252$4751e400$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <20070619093707.GC21181@calimero.vinschen.de> <f58p4c$qgd$1@sea.gmane.org>
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jun 19 10:14, Dave Korn wrote:
> > > On 19 June 2007 06:47, ICE wrote:
> > > > Has n e one done a successful compoilation of buildroot on cygwin
> > > > pls help
> > > > the error i get is
> > > > "
> > > > $ make
> > > u hv 2 prbs:
> > > [...]
> > > ur xcmplr is nt nstld prply
> > > [...]
> > > n u nd -lintl fr ntv blds.
> >
> > u r 2 hlpfl.
> >
> > Is there any good reason to violate written language so much?
>
> GIGO principle? ;-)
> (I found this rather hilarious :-D... And maybe next time the OP will take a
> little more care with their grammar.)
The proper response, I believe, is
omg rofl
Helps to have a 17-year-old niece. :-)
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu | igor@watson.ibm.com
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' old name: Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
Freedom is just another word for "nothing left to lose"... -- Janis Joplin