This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
RE: Building GCC 4.3.0 on Cygwin...
- From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
- To: "'urp'" <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:07:59 +0100
- Subject: RE: Building GCC 4.3.0 on Cygwin...
- References: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0703222205040.15035-100000@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it> <4602FE46.50E27743@dessent.net> <014b01c76e78$3be56a10$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <005301c7716c$9f1ef000$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <20070328200618.GA9210@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On 28 March 2007 21:06, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 08:09:34PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 25 March 2007 00:55, Dave Korn wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 March 2007 22:08, Brian Dessent wrote:
>>>
>>>> The real problem seems to be that the libgcc is broken:
>>>
>>>> /home/User/cvsroot/gcc-obj/./prev-gcc/libgcc.a(_ctors.o): In function
>>>> `__sgetc_r': /usr/include/stdio.h:414: undefined reference to `_ungetc'
>>>> /usr/include/stdio.h:410: undefined reference to `___srget_r'
>>>> /usr/include/stdio.h:407: undefined reference to `___srget_r'
>>>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>>>>
>>>> It looks like a problem with some function being defined as a macro when
>>>> it shouldn't, or vice versa.
>>>
>>> Inlines, as it turns out.
>>
>> Patch prepared, I'll finish writing it up and submit to the newlib list
>> later tonight, but first I'm going to have a celebratory beer or two on the
>> way home... ;-)
>
> Do we get to take a sip if someone mentions beer? It seems only fair.
>
> cgf
Here, virtual beer for everybody! Hooray!
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....