RE: Dumb Outlook (Was RE: typical cygwin bug communications (long))

["Dave Korn" <dk at artimi dot com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-talk-owner On Behalf Of Igor Pechtchanski
> Sent: 06 December 2004 18:05
> To: Talk Amongst Yourselves
> Subject: Dumb Outlook (Was RE: typical cygwin bug 
> communications (long))
> 
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: cygwin-talk-owner On Behalf Of Igor Pechtchanski
> > > Sent: 06 December 2004 16:17
> >
> > > On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> > >
> > > >   Damn, M$ Outlook is clueless[*].  If I hit "Reply all" to that
> > > > post, I get a reply with just one address in the To: 
> header, "Talk
> > > > Amongst Yourselves".  But if I only hit the single 
> "Reply" button, I
> > > > get a reply with two addresses in it, "Talk Amongst 
> Yourselves" and
> > > > the "Blaaab Babble Boogle Bop" one as well.
> > >
> > > So don't use Outlook... ];->
> >
> >   False inference!  Where does it say I _mind_ if that 
> happens?  I just
> > think it's clueless.  Most cats and dogs are clueless, but that's no
> > reason not to keep pets.....
> 
> Cats also scratch furniture.  I won't go into details on what 
> untrained puppies do.


  You don't need to.  There's nothing you could tell me about it that I haven't
already stepped in at some time in the past!


> > > >   So Microsoft must reckon 1 > 2.
> > > >
> > > >   Maybe it's going to be part of their new advertising campaign:
> > > >
> > > >      Freedom is Slavery.
> > > >       War is Peace.
> > > >        Ignorance is strength.
> > > >         Reply to author is Reply to all.
> > > >
> > > >    Bill Brother is watching you!
> > > >
> > > >     cheers,
> > > >       DaveK
> > > >
> > > > [*] Ok, ok, I know that's stating the obvious: what I 
> mean is "..even
> > > > _more_ clueless than we already knew it to be..."
> > >
> > > And you're still using it because ________________________ <-
> >
> >   What else would give me so many laughs _and_ 
> opportunities to fling
> > opprobrium at Microsoft?
> 
> You can do this without suffering Outlook on your computer. :-)


  Look, there's no need to worry, I assure you :) It's Outlook that's suffering
on my computer, not me!


    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....