This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: Add requirement for SYSTEMROOT to FAQ?
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 13:10:31 -0400
- Subject: Re: Add requirement for SYSTEMROOT to FAQ?
- References: <20041008141403.GA17593@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <NUTMEGg2X8uJABa6L0Y00000335@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <20041008143423.GD17593@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <Pine.GSO.4.61.0410081255370.27162@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
- Reply-to: Talk Amongst Yourselves <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 12:57:20PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 03:21:18PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
>> >> Sent: 08 October 2004 15:14
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 10:30:22AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of David A. Rogers
>> >> >> Sent: 07 October 2004 22:08
>> >> >>
>> >>>>In any case, I don't think an attempt to be helpful warrents a snippy
>> >>>>response.
>> >>>
>> >>>LOL, new round here are you? http://cygwin.com/acronyms#WJM !
>> >>
>> >>Yeah, I'm just mean, even when I'm not mean, since simple declarations
>> >>of fact are taken as "snippy".
>> >
>> >YJS!
>> >
>> >I didn't think your comment was snippy, I was just introducing a
>> >newcomer to the list's sense of humour.
>>
>> There were three messages in the cygwin list which addressed my
>> "snippiness" (thanks, Larry, btw). Don't I get to set the record
>> straight and introduce a new, useful acronym in the process?
>
>Sure you do. However, I'll let you use the acronym for a bit without
>putting it in the OLOCA (while I'm away for the weekend). It'll make for
>a lot of interesting interpretations of the trailing "S"... ];->
Or even the middle "J".
cgf