This is the mail archive of the cygwin-patches mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sep 3 19:02, JonY wrote: > On 9/3/2012 18:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Sep 3 17:34, JonY wrote: > >> On 9/3/2012 11:05, Charles Wilson wrote: > >>> On 9/2/2012 1:51 PM, Jin-woo Ye wrote: > >>>> Now it is clear that this patch would be needed other relevant projects > >>>> such as mingw, mingw-w64. thanks for your effort on simplified one. > >>> > >>> Yes, while it is not required that all of those systems stay exactly in > >>> sync, there has been some effort in ensuring that the pseudo-reloc > >>> implementation used by all three remains very similar if not identical. > >>> > >>> Please bring this patch to the attention of the mingw.org and > >>> mingw64.sf.net people, if it's not too much trouble. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Chuck > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Original message already forwarded to mingw-w64 devel list. Thanks > >> Jin-woo Ye. > > > > Do you want the patch I eventually applied, too? > > > > > > Corinna > > > > Yeah, that will be good too. > > I forwarded the CVS commit message too. It differs a lot from the original source, so you might contemplate to send a follow up mail to the mingw-w64 devel with the attached patch. > I'm not sure if anybody else is > more suited to comment on it than Kai, he is still on vacation though. No worries. I'm on vacation myself. If my slipped disc hadn't kept me home, I would be in England now :| Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Attachment:
pseudo-reloc.diff
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |