This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-patches
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Building for nocygwin
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-patches at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:39:33 +0200
- Subject: Re: Building for nocygwin
- References: <6BFA9AF2C7556E42AFF3F187ECAB07B802F9CFD0@bespdc01.mediaxim.local> <CA+sc5m=cKU5DaZFeJuEas-nfXD9uAsxq4V_9hcoUAM77u3OKNA@mail.gmail.com> <6BFA9AF2C7556E42AFF3F187ECAB07B802F9CFEF@bespdc01.mediaxim.local> <CA+sc5m=mC16bBFTBpPACoewcxKWt4KSsH22mUiVu0BrYCVObyQ@mail.gmail.com> <6BFA9AF2C7556E42AFF3F187ECAB07B802F9D004@bespdc01.mediaxim.local> <20120423140440.GG7097@calimero.vinschen.de> <6BFA9AF2C7556E42AFF3F187ECAB07B802F9D01E@bespdc01.mediaxim.local> <20120423153719.GB1133@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4F95AEF4.7040407@users.sourceforge.net>
- Reply-to: cygwin-patches at cygwin dot com
On Apr 23 14:35, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2012-04-23 10:37, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:52:54PM +0200, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
> >>I *get* that. My problem was, the web is so cluttered with pages mentioning
> >>the no-cygwin thing (including the cygwin FAQ!) that finding a good howto is
> >>nearly impossible.
> >>
> >>Is there a deep reason not to amend the FAQ?
> >
> >No, there is no reason not to change the FAQ.
> >
> >Could someone provide some appropriate words?
>
> Patch attached.
I uploaded the changes to the FAQ pages on cygwin.com.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat