[PATCH] <asm/byteorder.h> missing prototypes warning

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Apr  3 09:15, Dave Korn wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
> 
> >   Maybe we can call it __extern__ (so it looks like a c99-compatible extension
> > keyword and doesn't cause problems for non-GCC compilers)
> 
>   ENOCOFFEE.  That's not a c99 extension, it's a gcc extension.  Dur me!

Who on earth decided that a redundant declaration of an inline function
is necessary to avoid a useless warning?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat