This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-patches@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [Patch] cygcheck: New function: eprintf.
- From: Bas van Gompel <cygwin-patches dot buzz at bavag dot tmfweb dot nl>
- To: cygwin-patches at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 06:28:33 +0100 (MET)
- Subject: Re: [Patch] cygcheck: New function: eprintf.
- Organisation: Ehm...
- References: <n2m-g.cnh67l.3vv64o3.1@buzzy-box.bavag> <20041118040155.GA10141@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
- Reply-to: cygwin-patches mailing-list <cygwin-patches at cygwin dot com>
Op Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:01:55 -0500 schreef Christopher Faylor
in <20041118040155.GA10141@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>:
: On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 04:12:45AM +0100, Bas van Gompel wrote:
: > Hi,
: >
: > Following patch probably does not make much sense "as is", but I
: > intend to flesh out this function in the near future. ``eprintf''
: > is intended to be called by display_error.
: >
: > The patch takes this shape in order to keep things trivial (I hope).
:
: Go ahead and check this in and don't worry about keeping things
: trivial in cygcheck. I don't think Red Hat is overly worried about
: the intellectual property in that source.
Checked in, Thanx. Next patch may be bigger. :-)
L8r,
Buzz.
--
) | | ---/ ---/ Yes, this | This message consists of true | I do not
-- | | / / really is | and false bits entirely. | mail for
) | | / / a 72 by 4 +-------------------------------+ any1 but
-- \--| /--- /--- .sigfile. | |perl -pe "s.u(z)\1.as." | me. 4^re