[AVShutko@mail.khstu.ru: Re[2]: [AVShutko@mail.khstu.ru: Re: BUG in sendto() function]]

[Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>]

I meant to ask if this patch made sense before sending 1.3.4 out the door.

Anyone have any opinions?  I'venever used ualarm but this seems straightforward
enough.  It's small enough to include without an assignment.

cgf

----- Forwarded message from "Alexandr V. Shutko" <AVShutko@mail.khstu.ru> -----

From: "Alexandr V. Shutko" <AVShutko@mail.khstu.ru>
To: egor duda <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re[2]: [AVShutko@mail.khstu.ru: Re: BUG in sendto() function]
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 12:32:37 +1100
Reply-To: "Alexandr V.Shutko" <AVShutko@mail.khstu.ru>
Organization: KhSTU
In-reply-To: <138167630259.20011011140809@logos-m.ru>


P.S. Why don't you implement ualarm function in cygwin ?

####################################################################
u_int ualarm (u_int value, u_int interval)
{                                                                     
  struct itimerval timer, otimer;                                     
                                                                        
  timer.it_value.tv_sec = 0;                                          
  timer.it_value.tv_usec = value;                                     
  timer.it_interval.tv_sec = 0;                                       
  timer.it_interval.tv_usec = interval;                               
                                                                        
  if (setitimer (ITIMER_REAL, &timer, &otimer) < 0) return (u_int)-1;                                                 
                                                                  
  return (otimer.it_value.tv_sec * 1000000) + otimer.it_value.tv_usec;
}
####################################################################

-- 
With respect,
Alexandr V. Shutko                           mailto:AVShutko@mail.khstu.ru

----- End forwarded message -----