This is the mail archive of the cygwin-developers mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Testing Posix asynchronous I/O


On Jun 12 01:18, Mark Geisert wrote:
> Updating my previous post...
> 
> > > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > Some testcase (here on cygwin-developers, not as patch) would be
> > > > nice, too.
> > > 
> > > I do have a couple already.  One is a (fairly large) test app I have that times
> > > various methods of copying the heap from one process to a child. AIO is one of
> > > those methods.  I could whittle that down to something using only AIO.  And the
> > > Linux man page for aio(7) has a sample program that can test AIO on something
> > > other than disk files.
> 
> The man page sample program, which does a single aio_read() on each
> file/device named in args, seems to work for all cases except the specific
> one demonstrated there, which is more than one /dev/stdin.  On Cygwin,
> satisfying the first aio_read() causes the second to be satisfied with no
> input.  On Linux, the program waits for each aio_read() to be satisfied in
> sequence.
> 
> > In addition to those two test programs, there's iozone.  That supports AIO
> > operations but would need to be ported to Cygwin.  IMNSHO iozone needs a -NG
> > re-write.  It is 5 source files, no header files, and 1K of its 30K lines are
> > #ifdef's.  And what it calls a Windows build is actually a Cygwin (32-bits)
> > build.  But it's there if needed, modulo some work porting it.
> 
> I have ported iozone to 64-bit Cygwin (not re-written) and I can see it will
> be very helpful in stress-testing the AIO code.  At the moment I'm debugging
> an odd strace message after many thousands of I/Os:
>       0 [sig] iozone 12248 wait_sig: garbled signal pipe data nb 176, sig 0
> which seems to say the code is internally sending "signal 0", but there's no
> obvious way that could be occurring.

This is weird indeed.

> > The "heap transfer" program I mentioned earlier, heapxfer, allows me to specify
> > heap size and number of simultaneous AIOs.  Simple cases, such as staying within
> > AIO_MAX AIOs, work fine.  I recently finished debugging a testcase writing 1GB
> > of data to a file using 512 AIOs.  So the first AIO_MAX AIOs launched as inline
> > AIOs, while the remainder were queued.  Then as worker threads became available,
> > they launched inline AIOs themselves.  Found a couple of nits but it's working now.
> 
> Most recently with heapxfer I've been testing aio_write()s of 2047MB in 2047
> AIOs on my 2Core/4Thread system.  Found and fixed another obscure buglet.
> 
> I will be AFK June 15..25 but wanted to post status since it's been a while
> since my last posting.  Comments welcome but in any case I'll keep testing.
> Thanks & Regards,

No worries and enjoy your vacation.  Apart from the few nits I really
like the code you provided!


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]