Investigating a fork failure
Jon TURNEY
jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk
Mon Aug 24 18:39:00 GMT 2015
On 24/08/2015 15:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 24 15:20, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> The backtrace looks weird. Did you run this with a Cygwin DLL built
> without optimization? That might be helpful.
I ran this using 2.2.0-1
I'm afraid windbg doesn't do a very good job symbolicating the backtrace
through cygwin1.dll, as it only has access to the exported symbols.
Feeding the RAs into addr2line gives:
> 0x00000001800ab085 fhandler_socket::fixup_after_fork(void*) fhandler_socket.cc:842
> 0x000000018006d8b7 dtable::fixup_after_exec() dtable.cc:895
> 0x00000001800469d0 child_info_spawn::handle_spawn() dcrt0.cc:688
> 0x000000018004897c dll_crt0_0() dcrt0.cc:797
> 0x00000001800c62e9 dll_entry init.cc:85
which hopefully looks a bit more normal.
More information about the Cygwin-developers
mailing list